header image

They Call It Democracy – Part 6

By Stuart Hertzog
October 29th, 2009

Lessons learned

Politics definitely brings out the worst in people

Green task list

They say that what doesn’t destroy you completely makes you stronger. Well, I’ve survived challenging the leader of the Green Party in Saanich-Gulf Islands, so I guess the experience has made me stronger. What did I learn from it?

  • Politics seems to bring out the worst in people
  • Power-seekers always take over a power structure
  • An élite doesn’t intend that its rules apply to them
  • People are easily fooled if you promise paradise

Seriously, though (you thought I was joking?) the experience of presenting myself as a nomination candidate has reconfirmed my opinion that politics is organised nastiness (as opposed to disorganised nastiness, which is what happens in big retail stores on Boxing Day, or in the USA, on Black Friday).

It’s all about power: about grabbing it, abusing it, and keeping it. Politics has nothing to do with ideals, or with creating a better world. That’s the realm of idealists and dreamers, ecological activists, and the alluring promise of religion.

Politics is entirely the realm of the power-hungry. It’s not for ordinary mortals, or even about policy, although politicians hide their lust for power behind policy planks and platforms. Policy belongs to the policy wonks; they and their experts are the only ones who really understand what they’re policying about.

E. Most Green Party members do not understand Green politics

It has become very obvious to me that although there is a considerable body of literature on the philosophy of Green politics, for most members and even for the party élite and staff, this doesn’t translate into an understanding of what this means in practice. Either they haven’t ever read it, or they don’t get it.

There’s a hefty gap between the Green Party’s professed values, which are written into its constitution, and the attitudes, actions, and even the policies of the Party on an ongoing basis. I’ve been particularly incensed by its flagrant disregard for participatory democracy, but that’s just only one of the Ten Principles of the Global Greens Charter on which its constitution rests.

This glaring dissonance is partly due to the influx of former Red Tories and dispossessed progressive Reform Party members who joined the Greens because of their concern about the environment or toxic pollution. That’s OK—any political party includes a range of political views. The problem is that there’s no ongoing education or even debate about what it means to be Green.

F. The Green Party has become very middle-class, small-c conservative

As a result, party Greens now are mainly small-c conservative, light green environmentalists, mostly middle-aged or older, and very middle-class. The hoped-for massive influx of young people into the Party hasn’t happened—yet, but this may happen later, like when they become middle-age and middle class.

There’s nothing wrong with being middle-age and middle class. I used to qualify for both these categories myself. Most Green Party members are mainly “nice people” in human terms, but let’s face it, most of them would qualify as what Margaret Thatcher and British slang called “wet”—Canadian-style, of course.

The problem with this kind of unfocussed, vague level of wetness is that such people tend to accept politics the way it is presented by the media, as being basically a spectator sport in which citizens can occasionally play a small part. There’s no in-depth analysis of root causes or attempt to change the system.

G. Most Greens are in denial about the realities of political power

“Wet” Greens come out with statements such as “Can’t we just be nice to each other and co-operate?” and “Together, we (who is this “we”?) can stop global warming” and “We (again!) can change things by being positive and banishing criticism, which is negative,” and other examples of political denial.

Most Green Party members believe that if they can just get some Greens elected to Parliament—even just one Green will do—all will be well. Magically, political co-operation will ensue and all problems will be solved. Global warming will stop, the skies will become clear, and all toxic pollution will end forthwith.

This is specious nonsense. Without a political vision that includes an analysis of industrial economics, the human power structure, and the relationship between humans, other species, and natural ecosystems, the Green Party is condemned to being a useless participant in a pathological and predatory industrial culture.

H. Elizabeth May is the worst thing that happened to the Green Party

I started this series by explaining that I had no axe to grind against Elizabeth May. I still don’t have a personal axe to grind; I just think that she’s the worst thing that has ever happened to the Green Party. It’s my view, shared by many others, that Elizabeth May is the Little Monster Who Ate The Green Party.

Sorry to have to come out and say it, but I think she’s awful. Yes, I know she is knowledgeable about global warming and many other environmental issues, and can be a very inspiring speaker. She’s a woman, and a lot of people—especially women—get turned on by seeing her confronting the Old Boys.

But the way she has converted the Green party into her own personal political path to Parliament, I believe goes against the very essence of Green politics. In empowering herself, she has disempowered others. In my view, she has the pathological need for power that I referred to at the beginning of this post.

Can the Green Party survive Elizabeth May?

Ibelieve that getting Elizabeth May elected to Canada’s Parliament will destroy any hope of returning the Green Party to its Green political roots. It will be finished as a genuinely ecocentric and progressive Canadian political influence.

The Elizabeth May Party could become successful electorally— after all, those wimpy “wet“ Greens occupy a position slightly to the right of the dead (so true!) centre of Canadian politics. But it will not connect to the heart of the matter.

I may be wrong, of course. In some ways, I hope that I am. But from what I have experienced and learned during my nomination campaign in Saanich-Gulf Islands, her manipulativeness, her nepotism towards her supporters, her poor strategic judgement, and her unrestrained lust for power, do not give me hope.

All that remains now in this story is for Elections Canada to deliver its verdict.


Next: Part 7—The Verdict

Read other parts of this series:

  • Part 1—Challenge
  • Part 2—Green Politburo
  • Part 3—Follow the money
  • Part 4—Denial of Service
  • Part 5—Formal complaint
  • Part 6—Lessons learned
  • favicon.ico

    Posted in Canada, democracy, Green politics | 7 Comments »

    Tags: , , ,

    Share this link

    Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

    7 Responses

    1. Ian Says:

      So are you ready to come to the NDP? There’s definitely more party politics in play, but we actually have a progressive stance and have the chance to affect change for the better.

    2. Stuart Hertzog Says:

      I hear that there are similar strains within the NDP. A change of party may be just the joy of change. As for fools and idiots, see below.

    3. Sebastian Ronin Says:

      Stuart, thank you for the time and effort you have invested in not only your campaign, but in this series of articles as a sort of post-analysis and de-brief. Will your message and concerns fall on deaf ears and blind eyes within the GPC community? Likely. If they did not, then it would not be the status quo GPC community, yes?

      IMO, your conclusion that “…the Green Party is condemned to being a useless participant in a pathological and predatory industrial culture,” is spot on as applies to the federalists. As a tangent to your classification of “useless participant” what comes to mind is the complimentary classification of “useful idiot.” The only hope left for realistic eco-politics is at the provincial/regional levels, where “Green” politics was meant to be applied all along. The current global crisis, with its myriad of sub-layers, rejuvenates to an entirely new degree this onus for re-localization.

      As for the May Party? For it to go down and disintegrate in righteous flames along with its leader when she gets trounced in SGI will be both tactical and strategic boosts to the re-empowerment of provincial parties. The federalist useful idiots can decry their loss till the cows come home. It will all be for naught.

      Twenty-five years! Such a waste of political time and energy.

    4. Stuart Hertzog Says:

      Thanks, Sebastian. It hasn’t been a total waste of time: the human race has managed to increase the concentration of carbon dioxide in the planet’s atmosphere significantly in the interim. There’s glory for you!

    5. Sebastian Ronin Says:

      Yes, but relative to the my trouncing last week, courtesy the membership of the GPNS, they are not even prepared to seriously entertain politically the entry onto post-ecological tipping point…never mind Post-Peak Oil. The mantra remains the same: smooth transition to some nebulous Green nirvana with inhabitants dressed in hemp clothing. One has to hand it to Stuart Parker: the “tie-dye mafia” retains its stranglehold…right to the last. Will it dawn on them that their own stranglehold has turned on them?

      As for any kind of “glory” it is light years removed from a comfortable night’s sleep inside my skin, enveloped within the grace of a clear political conscience.

      (BTW, my “trouncing” was so complete as to paradoxically flip itself into a significant victory.)

    6. GPC Observer Says:

      A trouncing so complete that the mentally unstable will think it’s a victory. I think Stuart knows something about that!

    7. Stuart Hertzog Says:

      Yes, I’ve noticed a degree of mental instability in some of the comments that have been submitted to this site, especially regarding my stand in Saanich-Gulf Islands. It seems that when it comes to politics, people allow themselves to foam at the mouth, yet they point to the behaviour of politicians as reprehensible and beyond civility. Perhaps politics is an outlet for people’s repressed rage, a social safety valve? But I wonder why these people have such repressed rage in the first place.

    Leave a Comment

    Add your voice to the ongoing discussion:

    Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

    About democracy cover

    Now available as an eBook!

    It's All About Democracy

    By Stuart Hertzog

    This intriguing collection from greenpolitics.ca offers a much needed and iconoclastic view of Canada’s Green parties.

    Activist Stuart Hertzog’s lively, insightful, and often wry commentary shows just how far Canadian Greens have drifted away from the original Green political principles.

    Its profoundly democratic vision offers a practical cure for our dysfunctional political system and a way forward on urgent global issues.

    Vital reading for all Greens!

    Paperback 196 pp. $25
    ISBN 978-0-9691159-2-2
    Annotated PDF $10
    ISBN 978-0-9691159-3-9
    EPUB e-Book format $10
    ISBN 978-0-9691159-4-6

    Click here for more information

    Join us on facebook

    greenpolitics.ca group on Facebook

    Follow us on twitter

    greenpolitics on twitter

    Support greenpolitics.ca

    PayPal logo

    This site listed on:

    • Green Bloggers
    • Best Green Bloggers
    • Blogging Canadians
    • Grokodile BC blog directory
    • Progressive Bloggers
    • Vote Green

    Support democratic media in Canada:

    Support democratic media in Canada

    Progressive Bloggers

    Creative Commons Copyright ©